matchPWM() is now part of Biostrings 2.7.47 (in BioC devel, so you need R-2.7).
Load Biostrings:
library(Biostrings)
Suppose 'pwm' contains a Position Weight Matrix, let's say:
pwm <- rbind(A=c( 1, 0, 19, 20, 18, 1, 20, 7),
C=c( 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 18, 0, 2),
G=c(17, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 3),
T=c( 1, 20, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 8))
Note that this is just a standard integer matrix with the 4 DNA base letters
as row names (having these row names is mandatory).
Some low-level utility functions are available for manipulating this kind of
matrix:
> maxWeights(pwm) # the max weight in each column
[1] 17 20 19 20 18 18 20 8
> maxScore(pwm) # the max possible score
[1] 140
Let's match 'pwm' against Human chr1:
library(BSgenome.Hsapiens.UCSC.hg18)
chr1 <- Hsapiens$chr1
Number of "best" matches:
> countPWM(pwm, chr1, min.score="100%") # takes about 5 seconds on my system
[1] 5152
With a lower cut-off value:
m <- matchPWM(pwm, chr1, min.score="90%")
See the 10 first matches ("first" means "smallest chromosome location", NOT "best"
matches):
> m[1:10]
Views on a 247249719-letter DNAString subject
subject: TAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAACCCTAAC...NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
views:
start end width
[1] 31931 31938 8 [GTAAACAA]
[2] 33324 33331 8 [GTAAACAT]
[3] 38425 38432 8 [GTAAACAG]
[4] 39177 39184 8 [GTAAACAC]
[5] 46971 46978 8 [GTAAACAT]
[6] 49952 49959 8 [GTAAACAT]
[7] 70381 70388 8 [GTAAACAG]
[8] 74359 74366 8 [GTAAACAC]
[9] 90714 90721 8 [GTAAACAT]
[10] 96544 96551 8 [GTAAACAC]
The speed could be improved, maybe by a factor 2 (or more, for longest PWMs).
Also maybe an additional argument could be added to let the user control how
the returned matches should be sorted ("left-to-right" or "best-first")?
Unlike MatInspector or the transfac-tool, there is no facility yet to suggest
individual cut-off values depending on the length of the PWMs.
See '?matchPWM' for more information (e.g. how to search the minus strand of
the chromosome).
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor/2008-April/022029.html
Leave a Reply